Kantor said:
Kasz216 said:
Kantor said:
geddesmond2 said:
Kantor said:
geddesmond2 said:
|
Kantor said
5) 9/11 was not staged by America. Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility. I don't suppose you're arguing that Al-Qaeda is supported by America? Considering America and its allies invaded the Middle East to try and stop it.....
Lol actually the CIA did fund and train Al-Qaeda back in the 1980s when they where the Jihad lol remember Rambo 3? yeah those freedom fighters John Rambo helped out later became Al Qaeda lead by Osama Bin Laden.
Also just because you seen a video of someone claiming responsability doesn't mean they actually did it. If Osama Bin laden and the Al qaeda were responsible for 911 and there known where abouts at the time was somewhere in Afganistan then why invade IRAQ? I'll tell you what that was all about, Oil. People shouldn't believe everything they see on the news. Also tell me why Osama bin ladens releasing audio recordings now to claim responsability. What did his video recorder break and he didn't want to upgrade to DVDs lol.
|
|
Why Iraq?
1) Nuclear weapons (turned out to be false)
2) Didn't like Saddam Hussein
3) Yeah, oil.
Saddam hated the Taliban. Nobody pretended for a moment that that had anything to do with 9/11.
So, you're saying America did stage 9/11? Because they enjoy invading the Middle East and having excessive security measures?
|
No I'm saying I don't know who was responsible for 9/11 but what I am saying is America had the most to gain from staging 9/11 and that people shouldn't believe everything there told. America gained an excuse to get one of there most hated tyrants out of power which they were trying to do since the 1990s under Bill Clinton, An excuse to invade the middle east, A chance to tighten up National security without any uproar from its people and of coarse the oil.
Also they found Saddam hussein in a god dam hole, A HOLE IN THE GROUND UNDER A DAM SHEEP FARM and they can't even find Osama Bin Ladden anywhere lol or maybe they don't want to find him yet.
|
Why would America want tightened domestic security? They had plenty of oil coming in already, they didn't really care about the Middle East (come on, they gave Afghanistan weapons when the Soviet Union attacked) until 9/11. There's another reason for the Iraq invasion- revenge. Absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. They could have easily invaded without 9/11- they'd have been wrong to invade, but that's already the case. Saddam was found in a hole in the ground in his own country which was occupied by American forces. Bin Laden could be anywhere in the Middle East, and still has many supporters in the area.
So basically, you're saying America staged 9/11 because they wanted to tighten security because some crazy satanist from 300 years ago wants to rule the world. Doesn't this sound somewhat ludicrous? Isn't it much more likely that a group of religious extremists wanted to hurt the Christian world?
|
Actually the real "Illuminati" if they exist wouldn't be Satanists but more likely Christian Deists.
Since the "Masons" and all the other crap they were supposed to descend from were basically Deists... who had Christian leanings.
Deists being people who didn't believe in EVERYTHING religion said because they didn't like that an all powerful god would trust soley in a book. As such they believed through logic and science they would best be able to understand the creator. Which they assumed to be the Christian god.
|
So...what, exactly, is bad about these people?
I remember Angels & Demons saying the Illuminati pursued science during the Dark Ages. They don't sound all that bad.
|
I think you need to follow your thread back up to the top, you know the whole part about starting wars for oil and controling the media. But who knows, they might be real swell fellows deep down, if only they'd open up and let us get to know them better.
And I mean, if they're doin gods work, let'em get'er done, amirite?
