jarrod said:
Nintendo won on the strength of their software. Consumers chose Wii and DS because of games like New Super Mario Bros., Brain-Age, Wii Fit, Wii Sports, Nintendogs, Mario Kart, Animal Crossing, Pokemon, etc. They make the best games in the business according to the massmarket. That's their greatest strength against Apple, just as it was against Sony. |
Some nice assumptions right there.
Yes the consumers bought the wii because of the software, BUT that does not mean it is the best software out there - it could just be better priced, marketed etc.
Also you say they are the "best" games. In what way? The best graphics? No. Best AI? No. Best online MP? No.
The most family friendly games? Certainly, but family friendly =/= best. Mario Galazy is probably the best platformer out there, but that is where genre leading titles end on the wii. Does it have a 3rd person shooter better than Gears or Uncharted? A hack and slash better than God of War? FPS' better than Killzone, Resistance, Halo etc? What about a racing sim better than Forza? Ora beat 'em up better than Street Fighter? The list just goes on.
The wii and the PS3 are aimed at two entirely different markets, so saying Nintendo beat Sony is like saying Kia beat Ferrari as it sells more cars a year - hardly makes the kia the better manufacturer, they just appeal to a wider market.
Nintendo make games that appeal to a wider audience than the traditional console games. That does not mean the games are "better" in anyway, and if you are to claim better, it is in no technical way, and so you are only really left with saying "better marketed" or risk saying better game design, which I think we all know is a load of ass.







