I never thought it would come to this, but after Reach, Halo 3 feels...

[kiefer23]

1337 Gamer said:

tuscaniman said:

1337 Gamer said:
i prefer halo 3. It honestly was a game that took alot more skill. its hard to win if you cant get control of power weapons and thats the way i like it. Halo reach is 2 steps backwards in my opinion.

Map control is a legit strategy. Going for power weapons is a legit strategy. But when someone wins solely based on the fact that they have the power weapons is cheap and bullshit. If Halo made the power weapons respawn then I would agree with you but when 1 person has it and nobody else has access to it your argument is void in my opinion. Quake 3 Arena was a game all about map control and power weapons ala railgun but the railgun respawned which made it legit. Halo:Reach finally brings a little more balance and strategy to Halo in my opinion.

uh power weapons DO respawn in halo... And what you said about q3:Arena applies to halo 3 except bout the railgun lol.

He means respawn's at the same rate even if somebody else is holding the power weapon already. On Halo 3 if someone is holding the Energy Sword another won't spawn for ages if atall. On Quake it'll respawn after it's normal time period.