@Hynad: Short answer: No it's not. Review my previous argument on the last page. 0.5% of the game library does not represent the overall package offered. Period. If you go to a scientific magazine (or your graduate paper or whatever) and say that your proof is that 0.5% of the total package is superior, thus the platform is superior, they'll laugh at you and with good reason.
As for the multiplats costing more etc, that's true, but that's true for BOTH platforms, not just one. And even if you look at exclusives alone, those 3 games are 2.5% of the total amount of exclusives, which basically leaves you in the same boat as looking at the total games. Also, isn't the X360 always being criticized for not having exclusives? And now, conveniently, all you people want to do is compare the exclusives, which the X360 clearly lacks. And that's supposed to be a fair comparison? Please.. I already explained this as well, and I also explained why multiplats are still the way to compare, but noooooo the only way that's right is the way that allows the PS3 to be superior, and not the objective one..
And I show bias? Really? Bias towards what exactly? Towards equality maybe? Or towards the lack of trolls? Or towards objective reasoning? Oh boy that must be real bad...
Truth does not fear investigation
