What do you think of this anti-religious statement.

[dunno001]

pearljammer said:

pizzahut451 said:

pearljammer said:

Yeesh, I couldn't have been more wrong with my earlier post.

Is anyone else baffled how anyone can say these two contradicting phrases and still take themselves seriously?

"My opinion is in a BIG MAJORITY anyways, and that's all that matters to me..."; and

"i think that because of my own reasons"

Also:

"i never said they shouldn't have have sex, just getting married and adopting kids because that's a tradition between a man and a woman"

The absurdity of this post aside, how can you even remotely consider adoption a tradition? It's hardly something to be considered as such. So long as a child is placed in a loving, nurturing home it matters not to me what home they're going to.

My parents are foster parents and from what they witness on a regular basis, your worries about same sex adoption, however unfounded they are, are insignificant considering what many of these children presently face.

this is such a incredibly stupid post its not even worht argueing with this guy

Then why even bother responding? Surely, it's at the very least worthy of a response with proper grammar.

To be honest, I could care less if you think either I or my post are stupid, but I am curious as to what in particular made you say so? If it wasn't at all worth responding to, the logical thing to do would be to not bother responding at all. However, you take a dismissive, bully-type approach in your response. It's really quite ineffective and, frankly, revealing.

...Irrespective of the first half of my post (upon further reflection, you could have meant something differently than what I thought by "My opinion is in a BIG MAJORITY anyways, and that's all that matters to me" - though by the bolding of 'big' and 'majority', I remain doubtful), I'm still quite amazed how anyone would consider adoption a tradition.

Actually it's easy for me to see why he replied: he felt as though being presented with more facts counter to his opinion was an assault on him, and since he can't refute facts, he needs to result to such a crude reply.

That aside, I do agree with what you're saying- his views are inconsistant, saying what he thinks at the time without any form of unity, and making up more stuff to try to support his failing point, through the adoption tradition.