Kwaad the rebel of the forum ;)

[Kwaad]

stof said: A rebel without a clue. Seriously, I love different opinions, but he uses bizarre twists of logic, and is one of the guiltiest on this forum for taking the "Console War's" seriously and lining up behind a company like a good little soldier, which is exactly what you said in your other thread is so unfortunate around here.

Wow. I was expecting to like you more after reading your post. Guess not. baka - You ignore me. :P Simple as that. :P AninParadX - The people who troll me, typically are trolls, and it dosent matter what is said. I'm famous and people pick on me. It's normal, it's to be expected. To all: You can say I'm stupid, you can say how I'm wrong, I dont care. Just dont call me a liar or you get to see more angry monster posts, that amount to my rage. :) Overall: Every generation, the console with the best games. Wins. When you come up with something agianst the PS3, I dont bring it back up, I bury it. As on that point... obviously I cant argue the PS3 without lying. When you say something like "Optimizing a game on the PS3 and 360 is like changing the setting in-game on a PC." I will laugh till the cows come home. Because posts like that are beyond childish. "It's like OCing to get the most power." ROFL. OCing hardware, is increasing the speed to get more power overall. That might be considered "Optimizing the literal hardware" But I dont think anyone can do that on the PS3 except sony. And if you think Optimizing the software means to turn off AA, and lower the textures... Once again. You are WRONG. That is tweaking, and turning stuff off. NOT optimizing it to make it run better. But let me go though a list of consoles with the best games. http://www.vgcharts.org/usayearlysum.php And I noticed something... Why does everyone say the PS beat the N64? Look at 2003... the N64 Had MORE SALES than the PS at the end of 2003. I would actually say the victor of that generation was the N64. My point is. Nintendo consoles usually have spectacular launches. And then Die in 6-18 months. And then the consoles sold after that, still keep great attach rates. Legit? or not? look at the numbers and let VGcharts decide if I am :P And Look at Sony. They take off slow and gather steam. I'm not saying what to like, or what not to like. When I say the PS3 is what big games will come to... it takes 2 years to make one of these games. Do you make it for the PS3 wich will probibally be #1 in 2 years... or make it for the Wii... Wich is #1 now... but looking at history... wont be. How can nintendo promise these developers they will be #1 in 2 years, for their game to launch on? Can nintendo promise multi-platform? They are too unique for a full budget game to go multiplatform. So if Nintendo cant promise #1 in 2-3 years. I would stick with Sony, or possibly the 360, because of it's numbers. Nintendo has already shown how horrible 3rd party stuff goes on the Wii. MOST of the Japan Wii Nintendo IP game sales 2,935,500 Non-Nintendo IP game sales 501,750 PS3 Non Sony IP game sales 486,750 Considering there are 1,592,000 Wii's 668,250 PS3s. These are japan numbers. If I was a publisher. I would say something along the lines of. Well I wont say it. It would be VERY vulgar. EDIT: I put a bold command around a place I used comas for you sieanr.