By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kantor said:
Khuutra said:
Kantor said:

I'm not sure where this is going, but go ahead. Direct me to a racist policy which doesn't fit my definition.

I know you're not from the US, but are you familiar with Jim Crow laws?

If that law was followed to the letter, black and white people would have had equal rights.

But, fine. Forced segregation is also racist. Optional segregation, however, is not.

But forced segregation does not constitute "harm" under your given definition. Am I to assume, then, that a law need not be actively harmful to be racist? If so, why would this be?