S.T.A.G.E. said:
Natal will be an experience all its own. Natal's camera is worlds beyond the Eye Toy, much like the move is beyond the Wii in terms of actual potential. |
not really here is the things that natal has over the ps eye (oh why do people argue against the ps eye always go back to the eyetoy, there is a generational difference between the 2 camera's)
how move counters advantages -
remains natal advantage after move is added *
only new augmented feature is gesture recognition. (able to determine what you want if you point with your finger) - move should easily allow for you to point to what you want but it also has buttons -
3d depth tracking - glowing sphere used for depth and to prevent light conditions from effecting the camera. -
*full body tracking *
one step up from the eye's movement detection instead of using the pixels, alone to determine movement, it will use a ir bar to help detect movement in a given distance. - the sphere helps tracking so there about even -
*area you have to be in will adjust depending on the size of the room. *
*built in processor to do the calculations, freeing up the 360, processor. *
*some motor things for tilting the camera and for fast zoom. *
then there the advantage the move itself is. there is probably more things natal has over the eye but many people don't seem to be aware of what the ps eye is capable of. I would appreciate it if someone would add to the list of natal advantages, I do like natal but I recon move + ps eye can do most of it
edit: was colour coded but colour doesn't seem to work once posted.
correct me if I am wrong
stop me if I am bias
I love a good civilised debate (but only if we can learn something).







