--OkeyDokey-- said:
libellule said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
stof said:
It got bogged down in trying to set up the Avengers, the whole "element" story was like a ridiculous Disney children's movie, The main villian was barely used and the whole thing was just not so great.
That said, I was entertained. I figure as long as you don't expect it to be nearly as good as the first one, you'll be entertained. |
Can you explain how exactly the first Iron Man was better? I'll be the first to admit the sequel has more flaws, but the good far outwieghs the bad. I don't think I've ever so strongly disagreed with the majority on any movie!
|
I prefered IM2 to IM1 too
but I dont know if it is because it was better or because my expectation were lower ...
|
I'll have to watch Iron Man again so they're both fresh in my mind. I just... I can't think of anything particularly special about that movie. The only real standout was Robert Downey Jr., and he's just as much a joy to watch in the sequel.
|
I watched IM1 and it was great .... during the 15 min when you discover Stark character
after their was way too much "too much" action style
but with IM2, I decided to put my "too much" radar OFF, and I enjoyed the movie simply for what it is : a american blockbuster
