By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thelifatree said:

I dunno, it depends how much people actually love bungie. As opposed to the halo IP.

I think it could result in an extra boost, but I don't think one developer can other a console that much outside of nintendo. Because the PS3 can't get halo. So it would have to be a new IP.

I personally don't like bungie or halo either, but I know I'm not the majority in the USA.

Edit: I answered the topic and now. activision has no reason to go non-multiplatform. Because Bungie Fanatics most likely bought the xbox.  But then again, it is activision. And if anything if you compare it to MW2 that sold better on xbox. So sony would have to pay activision a ludicrous amount, for a game that may not even be bigger than killzone 2.

halo is out of the question as MS owns it.

 

Bungie could develop something else too besides FPS but i have no idea what bungie would do

 

i don't think it will be fully exclusive.if timed exclusive,sony would pay around $50-100m atleast for the first game.it could be more for the second if the first is a big hit.

 

it could be also that Activision acted quickly and brought in Bungie in to protect Activision image and Infinity Wards Substitute but not for the COD franchise.