By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
De85 on 29 April 2010
Edit Thread
Ssenkahdavic said:
ROBOTECHHEAVEN said:
@ssenkahdavic, bungie wouldnt be bungie without m$ and thats a fact. if m$ never bought them and used halo as the must have xbox game and made sure everyone knew that for their start into the console race, bungie wouldnt be anywhere near where they are today. it just seems to me that bungie spit in m$'s face by signing this deal. so i will buy halo reach, but after that i hope every game they make bombs hard and is utter trash. i know my opinion is going to be in the very small minority but its my opinion.

They would not be where they are today without MS.  I agree completely.  Thing is, MS let them go independent.  Did they have to? No.  But it is probably a good thing that they did (think Activision-IW).  

Bungie had to sign a deal of this nature to stay afloat (since they are not doing anything else Halo after Reach).  Bungie needs a Publishing partner that can/will go to different platforms (MS obviously wont) and Activision might just be the right place for them.  Activision Blizzard is large enough where they have no problem "spitting in MS eye" (as you put it) where other smaller Publishers might just think twice about it.

Was it Bungie or MS that made the decision on Halo? Does anyone know?  

That's a load of BS and you know it.  Bungie will make a metric shit-ton of money off of Reach, more than enough to keep them going until their next game comes out.  They obviously have their reasons for signing a deal with Activision, but a desparate need for money because big-bad MS won't let them make a multiplat game is not one of them.