RageBot said:
dib8rman said:
RageBot said:
dib8rman said:
RageBot said:
dib8rman said:
FF7 increase means that FF 6 was a success and that FF7 was very anticipated.
FF 8's lower sales means that FF 7 was a failure and FF8 wasn't hitting a sweet spot
FF 9's lower sales means that FF 8 was a failure and that FF 9 wasn't hitting a sweet spot
rinse repeat and you have a justification for that slope. |
Really now?
Does that mean that Pokemon Red/Blue/Green were failures as well?
|
I don't know, were they?
|
Considering that Silver/Gold sold 3 million units less than Red/Blue/Green, they were, according to your formula, of course.
And if you insist that, since RBG are three games while SG are two, i'll just bring Ruby/Sapphire into the equation.
|
Hm, I don't know who you think I am to insist on anything.
I just wanted to see what you think I'm thinking, because you aparrantly are in my head.
Now that I know what you think I think, I can say you should stop thinking because your wrong.
|
So, since you don't try to prove me wrong, and only try to be smart and spin it, I assume that you understand that sales for a sequel can be lower that the prequel, even if the prequel was a very good game.
|
I have no reason to prove you wrong when your posing your beliefs as fact. I can't prove beliefs wrong and since it's beliefs I would be teaching you and I am no teacher instead I made nice little refferences to a certain author of Macroeconomics texts for you to go check out in my other post. Yes that was considerate of me and your welcome for that.
