Remnant on 28 April 2010
They argue that Sony forces consumer to agree to the ULA by removing other advertised features (Online, etc.) if they don't. And they have a quote saying a "promise" that Other OS would not be removed in future firmware update. The argument is that they have the option to either remove one advertise feature or loose many other advertised features and thus is oppression.
The fact that person used the Playstation 3 online means they agreed to the previous ULA which granted Sony the power to make changed at any time and for any reason. Case dismissed.
