| archbrix said: I don't even know where to start; your post is so scattered and again does not address my point. Basically, you keep posting the same old arguments again and again, saying that me and "my mob" (funny) are knocking Nintendo for not having gone with more powerful hardware and that graphics are all that matter, something I've clearly disputed several times; talk about backpedaling and smoke and mirrors. You say I should read some posts before jumping in? Try reading mine before you respond with some ridiculous explanation. You obviously have no argument against my point, which was once again, Nintendo could make better looking games on even better hardware, period. Your completely off-topic responses shows what I'm dealing with, and that you are beyond reasoning. @Tube didn't shoot down my stance, instead he offered another perspective based off an example that was at least ON TOPIC. I'm done trying to explain one thing to someone who responds to something else entirely just to win an argument, with your edited f-bomb filled posts. Fortunately there are many Nintendo fans on this site who, like me, are interested in intelligent discussion, not stubborn to the point of pretending like they don't hear the other person...
|
Don't make me laugh you simply refuse to see relevance because you've been shot down and now backpeddling on your original argument my post was on topic, choose not to see it if you want all I can say it'll be a unique way to save face in an argument you've sidestepped constantly and claim to be going offtopic when I don't fall for for your sidesteps especially this one your biggest sidestp of all, you also can't seem to read things in context as well hence your complaints of the F word. The last part of your post is the most ironic, you could of ended this simply by telling us what more poer would of added apart from graphical improvements as it stands you can't and have run off crying, just swallow your pride and move one you're done.
