Bodhesatva said:
Your arguments are totally reasonable in a world where the Wii does not exist, and that's why the 360 was criticized so much before the Wii became so popular (and even afterward, to some extent). The point is that now that the Wii IS here, and has soaked up such a large portion of the demographics outside males 18-30, is it even worth Sony and MS' time to try to get those demographics back? Because as of right now, games like Viva Pinata, Uncharted and Ratchet are running in to a brick wall and losing money. Every company has a limited amount of resources. Is it really better to be spending money trying to recapture the female/child/elderly markets, or would it be better to accept those markets as lost and focus entirely on the demographics you have succesfuly captured? |
You have a valid point there. I would say that the MS should keep producing games to keep the 18-30 demographic happy as i think nintendo has won casuals. But i wouldnt hurt for MS to release some casual games as it can now feed on the the new demographic the wii has opened (guitar hero showing that casual does work on 360). Sony on the other hand i think will get the biggest advantage as the ps3 will have FPS,RPG,Sim and Racing and a large variety of casualgames in its library eventually so it will cash in on both areas of 360 and Wii. Although in the same amount of time the Wii's library could be more diverse than both the 360 and PS3.
Basically (since i didnt explain it well) MS, Sony and Ninty could do many things to cash in on different demographics but only time will tell as anything could happen.
Wii Friendcode - 6327 2612 7683 5724
feel free to add me whenever (just PM me to let me know)