By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 24 April 2010
Edit Thread
scottie said:
Kasz216 said:
NiKKoM said:

Kasz216 said:

They aren't even saying that in public. 

I mean... lets review the facts.

 

1) Something happens.

3) West and Zampella are fired.

4) West and Zampella sue  Activision.

5) Activision puts up a countersuit.

6) Senior members of the team leaves

7) West and Zampella open up a studio with EA.

8) Activision promises bonuses to people who stays

9) More people leave.

 


Edited... we know the actions and not the truth.. we will find out everything someday.. I'm not claiming that they are innocent/wrong on either side but we have to wait to find out who was doing wrong..

What I posted WAS the actions.

You just edited it to try and remove all the things that made them look bad.

Like singing a deal with the company they were accused of making a deal with.


That they signed a deal with the company they were accused of making a deal with is a fact.

 

that they signed a deal with EA after being fired from Activision is in no way a crime or breech of contract, because the act of firing the people breaks the contract

No, it was the negotations before that did that.   It's pretty obvious they were done based on just the amazing speed in which this was done.  If they really cared about "creative control" they would of just started up their own company.   You don't think the guys who made MW2 couldn't get a loan?