NiKKoM said:
But.. thats not the way to do that... you say: "they aren't telling the truth... and here is our evidence... Mr judge & jurors" Simply telling "they aren't telling the truth" would be enough for all the gamelovers.. but not in court.. jurors must look at the evidence not public opinion.. |
They aren't even saying that in public.
I mean... lets review the facts.
1) Something happens.
2) West and Zampella are fired for negotiating under EA when they had a clause saying they aren't aloud to negotiate under contract along with other non sited issues.
3) West and Zampella are fired.
4) West and Zampella IMMEDIATLY open up a studio with EA. Sue for Activision for when they were fired. (Not why.)
5) Activision puts up a countersuit.
6) West and Zampella contest nothing.
The fact that people actually think West and Zampella are innocent here boggles my mind. I mean, they opened a studio... with the exact company they were accused of negotating with... practically immediatly after being fired.
It would be like Apple firing me for spying on them to Microsoft and that I was arranging a deal to be President of the Zune branch... then two weaks later I got a job as President of the Zune branch.








