scottie said:
Kasz216 said:
NiKKoM said:
Kasz216 said:
NiKKoM said:
| Kasz216 said:
West and Zampella were upset because they decided to sell right before Modern Warfare became huge... heck, they haven't really even refuted any of Activisions claims.
|
Duh.. they are preparing to go into court... why say anything so the other party can use it and prepare their defence...
|
Because if your innocent, nothing you say can be used against you.
|
You're smart enough to know that it doesn't work like that in real life..
|
Sure it does. At least if all you say is... "They aren't telling the truth."
Someone who's innocent... has no problem saying "I'm innocent." well unless it's an episode of Law and Order or Law and Order SVU and they need a clifhanger last minute reveal of "Wait it was this guy all along!"
In fact... if your innocent you usually want to shout it from the rooftops... afterall not doing so pollute jurors wondering why you aren't.
|
I gotta disagree with you here Kasz.
If you say, before the court case that you were innocent and have irrefutable proof of this, then that just gives the other side time to think up a lie good enough to refute it, the innocent do not always prevail, unfortunately
|
So, without them saying "I'm innocent and I have proof." It is your opinion that the other side is going to assume they are in fact guilty... and are going to admit they are guilty.
FYI. When accused... Activision said "I'm innocent and I have proof." Then with that proof filed a counter claim.
