| numonex said: http://www.statementanalysis.com/jackson/ You can tell whether a person is guilty or innocent in regards to what they say. In this situation Michael Jackson never denies the allegations. Jackson makes us believe he has something to hide. He sounds like he is guilty of the sexual molestation. I could post some articles about witnesses seeing Jackson molesting kids but he pays them off or threatens them all if they say anything about him to the authorities. He actually molested a lot of kids. His staff caught him in the act but he would have them silenced. Michael Jackson came across as if he was above the law. I am Michael Jackson I can do whatever I want. I am famous celebrity, I am rich and I am powerful. Michael Jackson clearly proved by being so rich and powerful you can get away with anything. |
Wow, what a bunch of distortions.
He states "I did not molest that child". An answer to a statement given by a lawyer within the court for being tried under allegations of molesting one particular boy. Suddenly that means he's been paying every other parent who has allowed children to stay at his house and he's apparently been molesting all these kids?
All you can say is "Michael Jackson is rich therefore he's guilty!" in this laughable redundancy that you keep repeating.
You have no credible sources of information and no actual statements to back yourself up. That article you posted was some guy "analyzing" Jackson's statements by taking them out of context outside of the courtroom procedures for which their meant for and making a bunch of baseless assumptions with no merit in fact.
You have absolutely no credibility. Give it up and stop repeating this ridiculous rant of yours.
