CommonMan said:
I'm sorry you found my post insulting, but reading your prior posts led me to believe that you don't understand consumer pricing models and the supply/demand structure, I wasn't intentionally being insulting but I can see where it looked that way. Seeing this post and you listing that Sony has a better quality than Nintendo, your stance makes sense. If you think Nintendo's system and games aren't worth much, it's kind of silly for me to argue with you. Bear in mind though, Sony is not offering you a "deal", they are offering you a product with X amount of features at a price that the market will allow. I personally think that Nintendo's games are much higher quality than Sony's and are $10 cheaper to boot, to me that may seem like a deal. But it's not. It's a game at a price that the market will allow. |
Nooo lol Damn my broken english (?) I wasn't being sarcastic at all... I was just thanking your reply - you could have just said "you suck at this" but you cared to explain (even tho I was already aware of it), unlike some previous replies (to me). And I'm not being sarcastic now... Maybe I should've said "your honest reply". Thanks anyway =p
And I do recognize quality in some of Wii's (First Party) games (once again, I've said it in one of my many previous posts on this thread), I was just trying to explain why I think that Nintendo could provide a better service to its clients, starting on the price. But that's just my opinion, and if we go on like this, we'll be stuck in an eternal loop lol







