Final-Fan said:
PhoenixKing said:
Final-Fan said:
PhoenixKing said:
... and you ignored everything that I said about how numenox himself believes guilt is decided by the wealth that one has worked hard for. ... |
... CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND WHAT I HAVE TOLD YOU ABOUT ME NOT BEING IN AGREEMENT WITH NUMONEX ON EVERYTHING? I already agreed that he was wrong on many points. I admit I didn't specify what exactly I disagreed with him on ("plenty") but I certainly do disagree that everyone who is rich and charged with a crime is guilty ... [edit: or who settles out of court for semi-large amounts]
I'd appreciate if you'd at least acknowledge the bolded. Otherwise I agree that further debate is likely to be fruitless, though I doubt you'd agree with my opinion that it's due to your own misinterpretation of others' positions and absolute faith in your own position.
|
You haven't exactly stated what you don't disagree with him on and the same can be said about your position. In the end, we both think we have the better interpretation.
|
Excuse me
and no.
... OH WAIT. "DON'T disagree"? So are you really asking what I do agree with him on? I'm not being clever here, this is actually a legitimate question, which the other isn't because I already gave an answer to it.
To answer that question, I'd like to remind you of an earlier post of numonex's.
"It will be interesting to see how this case unfolds. More than likely he will be sentenced to prison for a long time. US hands out long prison sentences to child molesters. Will there be more victims? Police will be building up a solid case and gathering evidence to put this creep away for a very, very long time.
Victims of child molestation do not get over it. They are psychologically scared by it for the rest of their lives and need psychological counselling ASAP. The perpetrators of these abhorrent crimes need to burn in hell. They are sick twisted perverts. So what is they may or may not of been victims themselves of child molestation. Nothing excuses this sort of behaviour."
I don't believe in hell. Also, I think I'd rather have "trying to build up" instead of "building". And replace "more than likely" with "probably". After all, just being an MJ impersonator doesn't mean he's going to fondle kids, despite the jokes -- there's some reason he was arrested.
Other than that, I cant think of anything else at the moment in that post that I couldn't agree with.
Also, it's my opinion (which is to some extent in agreement with numonex) that Michael Jackson was probably guilty. I took the time to check out your source. It turns out that it's basically something that ANYONE can post, NOT vetted by CNN. In fact, this particular "story" is fiction.
http://www.examiner.com/x-15033-Memphis-Celebrity-Examiner~y2009m7d5-Michael-Jackson-Jordan-Chandler-never-admitted-to-lying-despite-reports
Here, a real news source brutally destroys this canard. I hope you were spreading this story due to being gullible -- considering the alternative.
|
That so called "real news" has absolutely no credible source of info and isn't even a news station or listed under news. The man has no proof of his statement either.
Furthermore, at least mine is actually from a news station and printed on the site despite not being vetted. They wouldn't allow information on their site to be posted without having looked it over so content such as racist material to outright fabrications wouldn't give them any negative reactions from the public.
So, no you didn't "totally and brutally" destroy anything. How can you? Your article has no source.
I also find it laughable that you don't actually disagree with Numenox at all. You just have less certainty regarding the issue.
Therefore, we have nothing more to discuss. You have no idea what you're talking about and likely haven't looke-up information on the cases as in-depth as I have, as is typical of witch hunters. Accepting the guilt of people without trying to learn more about the subject in question.
Good day.
