Squilliam said:
Nope its not. However the alternative was what? Sit on the money? Buy another couple of companies? So far the ROI is better than the interest they would have recieved from sitting on it and the latter option could have gone either way. I don't see them as being mad, perhaps more disapointed that they couldn't have done more/better. |
Oh, I'm not suggesting that MS shouldn't go out and seek new markets. They have to, and it's clear that they're trying quite hard to do so. MS knows that companies are either growing or dying, it's just that their efforts to grow aren't meeting a lot of success.
I think Microsoft's problem is that they keep trying to take over big, established markets instead of persuing fledgling markets or creating new ones. They try to tackle search well after Google has it sewn up, mp3 players after Apple has it sewn up, consoles and Sony, et cetera. They had a pretty good position in smartphones but they let it slip out of their grasp. They keep going after companies that are big enough and entrenched enough that they can withstand Microsoft's huge size and deep pockets.
If I were Ballmer, I'd spend less time looking enviously at the markets that rivals have seized and more time looking for markets they haven't seized yet. He was sharp to identify the threat that Linux-based netbooks represented and moved quickly to crush it. He needs to use that perception in an aggressive manner and not just a defensive one.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







