radiantshadow92 on 21 April 2010
| RolStoppable said: @CGI-Quality If you still haven't noticed, you have put games into the platformer category that clearly aren't platformers. leo-j is young, so I don't mind it too much if he gets something wrong, but you should know better. jarrod posted a list of Nintendo's platformers this generation and it makes Nintendo easily the sole top dog of the genre. Sony just isn't on the same level, it's not even certain if they rank second this gen, much less of all time. The Sony is dead to me/Hannah Montana post today was a joke. Me accusing other people of bias is not hypocrisy, it would only be if I denied my own bias and claimed myself to be a 100 % objective poster. Which I never do (unless it's for the sake of a joke like my Top 8 consoles thread). The hypocrisy is actually coming from you. You keep saying that you give credit where credit is due, but why is it so hard for you to say that Nintendo is without a doubt better than Sony when it comes to platformers? After all Nintendo wins in both, quality and quantity. You write that off as "opinion". |
errrrrr >_<
OT: yes they are, yes they are.
