Mr Puggsly said:
Because its generally free means it should always be free? Sony, Steam, and Nintendo doesn't pay for the servers for every game like Microsoft does (excluding EA games). Hence, offering online play on the PS3, DS, Wii, and PC becomes another expense for developers/publishers.
Also, people don't need the $500 or $300 versions of Windows 7 and Office. Office Home and Student is $150. You could also get Open Office for free. Windows Home Premium is about $100. It basically comes free with new computers as well. |
Exactly.
Microsoft heavily favors developers. Sony's service is free, but guess who they charge for bandwidth? Developers. It's not free, someone has to pay for it.
As for speaking of playing StarCraft for years... Well, I did too. And I remember server splits. I remember logging on and seeing 3 copies of myself in a channel (but none of my friends, who were in the same channel). I remember trying to join games that would freeze. I remember everyone in my circle of friends attempting to host games, trying to find the one of us everyone could connect to.
Xbox live, you log on, enter a standard matchmaking setup, and a minute later you're in a game. Technology marches forward, everything gets better, and costs rise. If you bargain hunt, what is MS charging for the service... $3? $5 a month for those of us who can't be bothered to save such a small amount of money. It's not exactly price gouging. And Live has enough special features to be worth it







