mrstickball said:
Well, typically, people with a libertarian-leading ideology would be. However, in Emma's case, she believed the ends justified the means and wound up supporting violent anarchist movements in the name of 'liberty'. But mind you, in her case, her works merely influenced the assassin. She had no direct involvement, other than the ideological beliefs. |
That sounds relatively utilitarian. Which I've never fully supported because its impossible to truly know what the consequences of your actions will be because people simply don't have enough information to make great predictions. Thats the problem with the "ends justify the means" or "for the greater good" like thinking. You may think the outcome is worth it, but you'll never truly know if it was until you actually do it. And as most people know, even the best laid plans can go down the drain because of unforseen consequences etc.
