Scoobes said:
Kasz216 said:
Which is irrelevent. Since he was referring to this as "An unknown health risk that could of lead to his death by punching."
Which it wasn't.
His death was in no way caused by said corporal punishment... like, at all. In an odd way it probably led to a better chance of saving his life.
The death, and corporal punishment used against minors is two COMPLETLY different arguements. Which is all that I am saying. You need to seperate the two.
Well that and said corporal punishment isn't risky. Disagreements with corporal punishment against minors needs to be levied on something other then a worry of health arguement... since that isn't a substantial risk.
A better reason would be say "It's just wrong to hit anybody who's a prisoner unless they are activly fighting back against their guard."
Which is why I think said corproral punishment is wrong. However it's important to treat this for what it really was. Two completly unrelated cases.
|
Kaz, this is from your own link:
"But a medical examiner said the "forced inhalation" of ammonia caused the teenager's vocal cords to spasm and block his upper airways, and he died of suffocation."
So there was a possibility that they actually made things worse and actually could have lead to his death.
|
Yeah, that was a second autopsy, after the govonor was pushed by political forces. Pretty much every medical examiner who looked at the case after that has described that second autopsy as "pure fantasy" and political wrangling.
Expert opinion is that the first autopsy is correct.
