By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mise said:
Kasz216 said:
,

1) It doesn't really change the point

2) The core issue isn't the same... the scale makes it not so.  One involves the death.  The other involves bruises.

3) No, but being a county sheriff, you are in fact trained and know what kind of attack can and would hurt somebody.... these were in fact... trained proffesionals... and they actually had the nurse there to diagnose any problems.  That's why they actually did cause the ambulence when significant problems arose.

1) Doesn't still make it acceptable to use corporal punishment on minors IMO, regardless of how controlled or well-intentioned it is. I do understand why they did what they did, I just disagree with it.

2) Fine, I'll drop this.

3) I never believed they actually tried to cause any long lasting damage to the kid. Doesn't really change anything IMO.

1) I also disagree.  However I think your level of outrage is far out of place.

2) Agreed.

3) Sure it does.  They are trained proffesonals.  There was no risk of them actually beating him to death.  (outside of malice.)  You argued that it doesn't take a trained person to kill soemone with a blow... which is true... however if you are a trained person you can make sure you won't kill someone with a blow.