| Squilliam said: To prove that something being more accurate is better, you would have to prove how being more accurate makes it better. Better in this instance being a game interface probably amounts to 'more fun to use'. Just because I use the mouse/keyboard interface because I am most comfortable with it doesn't mean that I have the right to call 'dibs' on having the bestest interface that thy heathen scum console user brethren hasn't. I also happen to love Halo, Halo to me is the apex of FPS games on consoles because in terms of controls and physical interface its the easiest console shooter to play by a mile and a half. The next one in line will have wide open spaces and a 78 degree FOV which will be heaven for me. I don't love the Wiimote because I don't love many games which make use of it, at least in terms of shooters. The standard PS3/Xbox 360 interfaces are very respectable interfaces. They allow people to enjoy a wide range of genres which is pretty fantastic. Loving one interface is not reason enough to think that any other interface is the sucks. The internet is full of stupid, so if people don't like something, it = sux and theres no scope for the idea that other people might have other values than yourself. |
dude no im sorry it has nothing to with halo or the conduit, it has everthing to do with precision and the gamepad does not have better precision than a mouse or recent motion controller.
why do you think games like starcraft or games like world of goo stay away from the gamepad ? its not becuse the gamepad is to good for them its because those games are to damn precise for a gamepad.
the wii could have rts titles done perfectly but they wont sell instead it brings a more colorful puzzler like world of goo and succeeds brilliantly, shooters are no different the aiming is better with a mouse or motion controller and that is the MAIN mechanic of a shooter , gamepads for shooters worked for a while but now we can implement better tech for game consoles and its about time they changed it
