By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Xero said:
It's hardly a 'big assumption'. Of course wireless is typically going to be more convenient for people, and wires are in turn an inconvenience. I can't imagine anyone who wouldn't see wireless, especially when the only alternative wired options were $100, as an asset.

If perhaps you're referring to the later section of my post (which you didn't make clear, nice one), it's no more of a 'big assumption' than your initial 'wireless connection is at best worth 5%'.

The alternative wired options are $100?  For what?

Either way... I wouldn't want to use Wireless.  It's the main reason I got a 20 gig PS3 infact... that and the BC.

Wireless sucks for gaming, sure if you've got a labtop go nuts.  Wired will usually give you a better connection and at worst case give as good as a connection as wireless does. 

Wireless isn't so bad, at max you're going to add 10ms of latency which isn't likely to be noticable as on dedicated servers you're already going to be playing on ~50ms. I have 3 PS3s, one on a wired connection, two on wireless. The only area I notice the additional lag is with fighters, such as teeken. Most decent FPS make calculations client side so so long as the latency isn't too severe you won't notice a difference between wired/wireless. 

It's of course worse than a wired connection, but most people wouldn't notice the difference.