Why Shooters Are Better on Wii

[rocketpig]

freebs2 said:

In my opinion:
Mouse&Keyboard are still the most precise and efficient way to control FPS, it works perfectly.
Wiimote is not more realistic, matter of fact it focuses on the sensor bar it's not like 1:1 aiming on screen (I remeber the G-con), but on the other hand I find it more fun to use, it gives you the feel of shooting, also it's still a way more accurate than the dual analog system (Metroid Prime is a sufficient proof) while it's as ergonomic as normal gamepad (and not like a keyboard) plus it doesn't constrain you to play on a desk. Using the wiimote patches for example I could play PC fps's on a 32" TV insted of on a 17" monitor.

Finally, it won't work well only on FPSs but on any action game involving shooting like Gears Of War,Uncharted,Lost Planet,Dead Space ( a real one not like extraction)

First off, it's your own fault if you're playing on a 17" monitor. Most real gamers have moved on well past that point. It's a matter of distance, not size.

What you find "more fun" is exactly the problem with this article. It's an opinon. Personally, I want to agree with you but the fact remains that no developer has developed a game that rivals Halo/Counter-Strike/UT/whatever in accessibility and overall challenge. YOU may like that but the fact remains that the Wii is a piece of shit when it comes to online gaming, no matter how you feel about the game. It's crap. No, I take that back. IT IS SHIT.

Was that imflammatory enough? It offers the same level of connectivity that I had in 1994. It's crap. Until Nintendo pulls its head out of its ass, I'll hold that opinion hard and fast.