Kasz216 on 13 April 2010
| Xero said: It's hardly a 'big assumption'. Of course wireless is typically going to be more convenient for people, and wires are in turn an inconvenience. I can't imagine anyone who wouldn't see wireless, especially when the only alternative wired options were $100, as an asset. If perhaps you're referring to the later section of my post (which you didn't make clear, nice one), it's no more of a 'big assumption' than your initial 'wireless connection is at best worth 5%'. |
The alternative wired options are $100? For what?
Either way... I wouldn't want to use Wireless. It's the main reason I got a 20 gig PS3 infact... that and the BC.
Wireless sucks for gaming, sure if you've got a labtop go nuts. Wired will usually give you a better connection and at worst case give as good as a connection as wireless does.
