SamuelRSmith said:
Spare me your clichés. I think the thing that's keeping the UK safe is that we're not in strikable distance of anybody who would be willing to use a nuclear warhead against us. Hell, thanks to the EU, we're pretty much a million miles away from anybody who would want to attack us in any sorts of means (outside of terrorism, etc. but possessing nuclear weapons hardly stopped the IRA, or any of the modern terrorist groups from attacking us). Plus, a nuclear-free UK would still have support from a nuclear-possessing USA and/or France. Would it be wrong for the UK to free-load off of nuclear allies? Probably. But, frankly, I don't give a shit. The USA have unwittingly taken on the burden of being the protectors of Western Europe and her other allies, and France... well, that's just full of French people. :P |
Kinda depends how the whole Iran situation goes. Afterall that's why Obama revamped the shield.
I wouldnt't say the USA has unwittingly taken on the burden of protecting western europe either.
I think it did it on purpose. Why I don't know... it's long past where Europe can't take care of themselves.
The Europeon Union as a combined force isn't quite USA level, but there isn't another country out their that could challenge them, well assuming that the command bottlenecks don't screw them up... but even then... who's going to take on the EU conventionally even with Nukes? Russia?
Russia really isn't a threat to the EU anymore, so long as the Western EU countries are willing to be proactive when the eastern EU countries are threatened.








