The Ghost of RubangB said:
Not by mutating generations of children, including people born long after the war is resolved, and not by bombing a town with a huge immigrant Korean population that had nothing to do with the war. But I don't buy into the idea that that war in particular needed drastic measures because they were fanatics. Conventional weapons are always enough. The bombing of Tokyo wiped out 100,000 non-combatants (almost as many as the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, and more than Nagasaki), and 25% of the city. But the next generation was born without birth defects from radiation. |
An interesting thing is the US actions in WW 2 were more horrific than ANY attack on the US in the past 100 years. It's a dangerous thing to say it's ok for us to do it and not another group. For instance 9/11 horrific as it was, was not nearly as cruel and destructive as what happened to the Japanese.
What I am saying is if you condem 9/11 then you must also condem the actions made by the US in WW 2.
PSN ID: KingFate_
