VGChartz Playstation Trophy League

[Ail]

KylieDog said:

fadetoone said:

KylieDog said:

chenguo4 said:

Come on now. 5 hours is still 5 hours, and 500 hours is still 500 hours.

 ..and easy is still easy.  That isn't what he was saying though.

It's exactly what I'm saying.

What do you think QFT means?

 

No it wasn't, to quote you.

 

"Well then you obviously haven't considered it is *difficult* for a lot of people to spend a large amount of time on a game.  I've only had time to put 35 hours into FFXIII and it's ALL I've played since release day. :)"

 

You was making clear people who do not have time to game much may find a game difficult.  I was saying peoples personal playtime does not change how easy or hard a game is.

 

 

PS3trophies.org ratings are flawed anyway, when the site was small people actually followed the voting rules and didn't factor time, it was partly enforced, since it has grown though are so many people openly admitting to ignoring voting rules and factoring time and it seems the admins gave up enforcing the voting rules.   Cannot use such different voting parameters for different games.  This is probably probably why so many easy games are getting 2 star ratings compared to obviously harder games even if the time needed to plat is similar.  Also getting people vote games harder because they need things like a PS3 Eye or a second controller.  The votes also fail to reflect any new strategies found or discoveries or changes to the game made after votes were made.   Need find a much better way to rate these games because I can go dig up a hundred posts in the difficulty ratings threads of people saying "Game was very easy, I gave it a 5".

 

 

Tell you what, you plat WKC and then we'll listen to how you would rate it :p

If the game is so easy that really shoudn't be a problem for you :p