fighter said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
fighter said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Grimes said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Globox said:
Maybe it was pure rumour = BS or maybe there was something to it, maybe there were discusions behind closed doors but it was probably too expensive for Sony. Sony doesn't need rest of 2K they probably wanted Rockstar north (GTA makers). Let's not forget EA was offering 2.1 billion usd to take over 2K, they refused. I don't see Sony spending 2 billion of 2K, not somethingSony does, especialy now when they have been losing money on PS3 for such a long time.
MS could do it, so could Nintendo since they roll in money.
Probably just a rumour. |
Sony has alot of money.alot more than Nintendo.
but they wudn't do it cause they only want Rockstar
|
Sony does not have more money than Nintendo. Sony has more assets but has much higher debt and expenses. Nintendo has built a huge cash reserve over the past few years and has little debt and low expenses.
|
u really think a company like Sony with $250B ASSESTS has less money than a company with $19 assets.
sony didn't just survive their huge losses with PS3 just like that.they have a big big pocket full of cash.and they are gonna make alot now
AMAZING !! A few posts back you are stating there is no way to know how mush liquidities it has and now you state it has deep pockets full of cash ???
Read the link i provided you, you'll be amazed how much debt Sony has contracted. And if you want to know just how tied Sony's pockets are read this :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116057893247189397-search.html?KEYWORDS=fitch&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month
Back in 2006, when Playstation brand was still almighty investors considered PS3's business model as a liability !! This shows how Sony's financial power depends on investors, how each and every of its' decisions needs to be backed up by the people they owe money to.
|
|
i was just estimating what they made from their years of innovation.and i think even you will agree how succesfull they have been,they would have atleast made more than nintendo with their whole electronics business
no you weren't, you stated "sony didn't just survive their huge losses with PS3 just like that.they have a big big pocket full of cash.and they are gonna make alot now" which is a blatant lie and a contradiction of your own position
that link had a shit old article,thats all,nothing else.you provide a 4 year old article with no figures.that aricle was a joke
proving Sony's financial power depends on investors doesn't require figures LOL
and sony was supposed to make heavy losses on PS3 and we all knew it and we know it how they survived it in 2010 today
and they made huge losses, otherwise you wouldn't use the term "survived" now would you ?
every company's power depends on their investor.you trying to teach me commerce here
i'm starting with common sense 
|
I'm amazed you so blatantly ignore your own false statements. Your capacity for denial is astounding.
|
learn to know what the person is trying to say and not just stick to the words.
a link with just a sentence of words is your proff for sony's finanancial power.anybody can write a sentence and if you it doesn't require figures then why did you even post the link
obviosly they made big losses.it requires money investment to make losses and alot more money to survive from it.
common sense?i think you are confused with the meaning
