greenmedic88 said:
Most everyone counts Twilight Princess as the first Zelda game on the Wii. To say otherwise is almost like saying that Halo 3 and Halo ODST didn't count as the first two Halo games on the Xbox 360 on account of both games being essentially a Halo 2 engine game with modifications and that Halo Reach is really the first Halo game to appear on the 360. Zelda will be a hot seller, but it's not going to be moving anywhere near the same amount of hardware as GT5. As for Dragon Quest; it should move a lot of hardware in Japan, but again, nowhere near the same impact as GT5, which appeals more to a general audience rather than a niche JRPG audience. |
Most everyone is wrong.
By your logic, the Playstation3 is capable of playing 2 or 4 (the 60 gb version) main series GT games, Most everyone knows this. Thus GT5 will not be a system seller.
The Halo analogy misses the point completely. Halo 3 could be played only one 1 platform, therefore people had to buy the platform in order to play the game. Therefore Halo 3 was a system seller. ODST wasn't a hardware seller because anyone willing to buy a console to play Halo already had done so. People could play Twilight Princess on the GC, so TP wasn't a hardware seller. Thus there are quite possibly Zelda fans who don't own a Wii. Do you understand or should I try to explain again? My wordiness is a bit hit and miss today, sorry.
I never claimed that Zelda will as much hardware as GT5 - it's a smaller series for starters. However It will be the third biggest hardware pusher left this gen (from an established franchise only, something for vitality/move/natal could push some hardware, and assuming that GTA and Cod stay multiplat)
So you make the claim that racing is a bigger genre than JRPG's in Japan? Thanks, I''ve been in a miserable mood due to homework all day, and reading that was the first thing to make me laugh out loud all day :)







