Zucas said:
SpartanFX said:
waron said:
funny how ps3 fans are arguing that killzone 2 looks better than crysis 2 with 2-3 month old screens of Crysis 2 that not only shows nothing but pile of garbage but also comes from old alpha version of the game and still ignore all GDC media that pretty much blown away everything killzone 2 could have. seriously, scripted events of killzone 2 vs realtime events of crysis 2, corridor shooter vs sandbox, dark game with nothing but simple looking warehouses vs rich open environment of new york full of skysrcapers and vegetation.
and we still have statements from all journalists who've seen latest version of the game - Crysis 2 is not the best looking 360 game, is not the best looking ps3 game and is not even best lopking atari 2600 game. it's THE BEST LOOKING CONSOLE GAME. PERIOD. and by the way it was still alpha footage that was shown. |
it's so typical of you to comments on the things you don't know,,,this picture is from video released to public on APRIL 9 2010:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfdiZKER4A&feature=player_embedded
when are you gonna learn not to comment on the things you think you know but in reality u don't????
|
Oh thank you for the video. After seeing it it looks much better than the pic shown haha. Just a bad pic from the game. Actually looks quite spectacular.
|
yea it does look much better in motion,,,i agree.It's gonna be the ebst lookign multiplat engine .this will hopefully see to it that the UE3 die.
graphic comparsion with KZ2 are not that fair,,,,This game still has time to be polished,,,it's open world with real time destruction.
on the eyes KZ2 is more apealing but again it's not as impressive as cryengine when you take in acount what cryengine offers.
This is an awesome news for us gamers.
the only reason i made the thread was casue i though it will be imperssive engine wise and will top KZ2,U2 and the likes graphic-wise,,,but graphically it's short of those on the consoles but it is impressive nevertheless.
