By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Ok, this is why I am inclined to believe that Nordlead is in fact a smart zombie.

 

He was the first one to mention that the powerful roles would have a kind of use cap. Which would make sense since his roleclaim apparently says he only has one use

Nordlead said:

you guys do realize that WoW said that people with useful roles will have limited uses. I don't see why we should encourage this type of behavior.
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3258328&page=3&postnum=23
I think any investigative roles would be best off waiting til night 2 unless they have unlimited (or a lot) of investigations. While we may clear 1 person tonight, it might prevent us from investigating someone who is actually suspicious on night 3 or 4.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3267016&page=1&postnum=79

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Here is another post that just puts off a vibe

Nordlead said:

Agreed, but I don't like encouraging someone to make a stupid decision. Also, the game should have 3 nights minimum where skills will be important. (9 people, 2 down per night) However, I did mistake that the game would last 4 nights as the last few games I've been in have had +20 people.

If anything, the insistance on flushing out a lie detector or investigative role seems scummy to me. Yes, I still have my big game mentality on, but so be it.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3267912&page=1&postnum=82

I hate to bring in the last game, but wth?!? WoW did the (exact) same thing that Trangent did last game, and we all know what happened there. He was hunted down relentlessly. And now when Nordlead brings up the same argument it looks suspicious? (Yes, I do remember that Trangent flipped scum).

________________________________________________________________________This post I’m just going to quote a bit of

Nordlead said:

ok, First off I want to say you lied during day 1. You didn't have to start the lie detector crap and claim zombie if you weren't a zombie. You now claim you are a Telephone Poll. Second you lied again, because you wouldn't have given the no-lynch a majority or even a plurality. This is a HUGE no-no for a pro-town player to do. Even if you are telling the truth now I see no reason to encourage pro-town lying, and I have no problem lynching you. I for one haven't lied once, you on the other hand we don't know how many times you have. Town should never lie EVER. liars are a thorn in my scum hunting side. You earned your way to the top of my list through such play tactics. In fact, you falsly drew the attention of the town. Now anyone who suspected you has nothing to go on.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3298630&page=4&postnum=23

I can see why Nordlead would be upset. It seems that he misunderstood Trangent’s role and thought that he wouldn’t have shown up as a zombie. This would have been a waste of his one and only investigation.

This is just what I think of him so far. And the reason that I will not vote for Nordlead. And keep my vote on the person that I feel is scummy