CGI-Quality said:
toastboy44562 said:
CGI-Quality said:
toastboy44562 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Let me give this topic a second go:
toastboy, you said WRPGs are more advanced and are therefore better, right? You should really explain what you are referring to. I think many people did miss the point of this thread. I agree with you about WRPGs, I like them more. But you should probably be specific. |
When I said those things, I meant that a WRPG is better at telling a story, it doesn't go to a cutscene like a JRPG, you play the story. WRPGs are open world, gives you things to do once the game is finished and is generally better tech. A WRPG id basically an open world JRPG with better controls and more replayablity
|
Eh.....some of those are still pretty subjective though:
- Better tech? Again, you'd have to be more specific.
- Better controls? Depends on the player.
- The cutscenes bit seem to be more a style choice rather than a flaw. Then again, that's just me.
|
by better tech I mean better textures and more enemies on screen on once (Not a cutscene)
by better controls I mean simpler, I hate scrolling through a bunch of moves in jrpgs. in wrpgs all i have to do is hit on button
I like consistancy, I hate average looking games with amazing cutscenes
|
Most of that still fits perfectly into a subjective opinion. The tech stuff (particuarly more enemies) is probably just a preference. Still doesn't determine which is "more advanced, better, etc, etc....". We'd need to know what all goes into creating these titles.
|
more work and better tech=more enemies on screen
less work and worse tech=less enemies on screen
I don't see what is the confusion...
Also, they couldn't even bring towns in FF13 (Probably best jrpg), and if you look into and wrpg these days theres town everywhere
