Killzone vs. Crysis

[priteshmodi]

_mevildan said:

Bamboleo said:

_mevildan said:
@leo-j

Before I jump in here, I just want to be 100% clear about what you are arguing...
Are you saying that KZ2 is better looking from purely a visual standpoint, or from a technical standpoint or both?

This post brings ups an interesting point.

While Crysis is undoubtedly superior in graphics to everyone apart of leo-j, I find KZ2 a game with better art style and color balance...

Its prettier with inferior graphics.

 

I was going to say (if leo replied) that if it's just how it looks overall that impresses him more, then I can't argue too much with that.

If he really does think KZ2 has more advanced engineering and is more capable than Crysis' engine, then we can talk.

You guys just said exactly what I've been trying to get across this entire thread. Crysis is technically the most advanced game on the market. That cannot be refuted by anyone with any sense of what goes on in a game's engine. Metro 2 and STALKER are the only things that have tech to compare. Whether it's the prettiest or not depends on what an individual likes to see. But leo-j clearly said in one of his posts that "Crysis is outdated". So that leads me to think he believes these PS3 exclusives are superior on a technical front.

I'm trying to show him (and anyone else who disagrees) that this simply isn't true because the tech behind CryEngine 2 still hasn't been surpassed by other games on the market and I'm giving direct examples of why.