Killzone vs. Crysis

[gwrath]

phxprovost said:

gwrath said:

phxprovost said:

lol i love threads like this.  Sorry kids KZ2 is garbage that just has alot of filters and post render improvements, while crysis is raw imagery.

 

So completely unnecessary. Killzone 2 is an incredible looking game, and what you have just said reveals your ignorance. It doesn't quite have the scope/amazing physics system of crysis's environments, but it is still a benchmark for this generation of consoles

is that the ps3 fanboys logic there? the truth is completely unnecessary?  search around the internet, hell there is a few on this sight i believe of the game devs from games like KZ2 and UC2 and even GOW3 talking about how they just use the GPU on the ps3 to draw the frame and then completely throw the cell at the image and apply every possible post render effect that have at it.  Kids thats making a crappy frame prettty through post render........

PS3 fanboy? Note that earlier in this thread, I clearly stated that Crysis is a better looking game than kz2. However stating something ridiculous as "KZ2 is garbage" is... well, you're right, unnecessary is an understatement. Oh, and please continue to refer to everyone else as "kids" to give yourself some kind of flimsy high ground, it suits your personality.