By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Gaming - Killzone vs. Crysis - View Post

Barozi said:
leo-j said:
waron said:
leo-j, please show me killzone 2 video that looks better than this i dare you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH8dSy-lrFg

Oh please, posting CRYSIS ON ULTRA HIGH modded with the lighting at an ultra level..*shows me you yourself might have never played crysis.. who not post screens from the game yourself instead of using ULTRA HIGH footage on youtube..*

And you posted a Crysis vid, where the uploader admitted that he converted the video with Windows Movie Maker.....

 

@ Mazty

Actually Modern Warfare 2 is one of the few multiplat games, where the PC version really looks far better than the console version. I wouldn't say better than Killzone 2, but comparable ? Yes at least !

The Far Cry and especially the HL2 part of waron's comment is obviously not correct (Apart from resolution and AA, the 360 version of the Orange box is even superior than the PC version, because it runs on the updated Source engine.)

If you count the Cinematic Mod for HL2, then yes it looks better than Killzone 2 ^^

 

Er what?

The PC version looks like ass. And how is 4x MSAA any good? The game has blatantly been graphically crippled thanks to the consoles and lazy devs and Killzone 2 on a HD TV is miles better than MW2 which has poor AA, awful sound and awful lighting which makes identifying a man from a wall impossible at a 15m or greater distance.

And no, the cinematic mod still makes HL2 look jizz, as the textures are better, but the polycount is still terribly low, as well as soft shadows and deffered lighting being next to nonexistant.  HDR is nice, but come on, there's a lot more needed to make HL2 look good than just HDR.