JMan on 12 December 2007
| kitler53 said: By Jason Szep ... "People look for self-evident numeral-letter substitutions: 0 for O; 3 for E; 7 for T; and 4 for A," he said. "This is simply a different and more efficient way of representing the alphabetical character." |
Huh? How is it more efficient to type 3 instead of E, 7 instead of T, etc? Is this a reference to texting? I don't text, so this really is a genuine question.
