By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:
Galaki said:
theprof00 said:
Galaki said:
So, you defend this "research" w/o knowing how it was done and then call us trolling even the percentage look way off?

Comparing that with vgc stats is totally off, too.
VGC equations are based on factual data and using that to make guesstimate.
And we all know people are totally honest when to do their multiple choice survey.

you have no basis to say that it's wrong.

@everyone else, how do people point and criticize things without even realize they are doing the very same thing they are criticizing?

Oxymoron much?

People aren't allow to disagree with "research" anymore?

wow do you know what an oxymoron is?

maybe you're referring to hypocrisy, which is what I described.

anyway, the comparison to vgc was that vgc doesn't say how it tracks things either, but it is funny that you support this site, whereas you attack another for the same behavior.

 

Vgchartz does say how it tracks though.

Furthermore Vgchartz has objective proof towards it's methods based on the amount of times it's been right making it luck is very very statistically unlikely.

All Vgchartz doesn't do is give away it's sources.

This survey is fine... if people realize that even most people who say they are going to get it when surveyed probably won't... however Vgchartz is FAR more accurate and has proof at that.

Surveys like this are *practically* useless for prediction.  What it guages isn't actual sales but general interest in the product, which may or may not be capitlized on at the time but additional promotions.