Splinter Cell: Conviction 5 Hours LONG!!! NO Thanks!

[johnsobas]

radiantshadow92 said:

johnsobas said:

radiantshadow92 said:

i dont understand what the big deal is. If its a good game, then what does it matter if its long or not? there are plenty of long games that are bad. Just because a game is short, doesnt mean its not worth it. SC has co-op and online and one of ign's points was the replayability. Now halo odst is a different story imo. odst gave the same the multiplayer as halo 3, rendering it to be worth half of what it is. SC, is all new, and the dev team working on it really has some sweet ideas. i dont see how a 360 owner can go "NO THANKS".

the op specifically said he wasn't interested in MP.  The importance of SP varies by person, a short SP will turn off some people.  I don't see anything wrong with that, if i can beat a game in 5 hours and i have no interest in MP then i sure as hell am not gonna buy the game. 

even if the gamer is not interested in mp. if the single player is damn good, why is it not worth the 60$? i get that the op may be on the ball about the game, but stating as if they were never going to play it is beyond me.

do i really need to state the obvious?  5 hours is not worth $60 for me period.  I don't care if its the best game ever, i'll just rent it.  It depends on the person, some can afford to buy many games some can't.  Some have better things to spend their money on and some are just passionate about it.  Why are you telling people what they should believe and how they should value their time and money?

 

That said i dont' own a 360 and am not that interested in the game.  I'm just saying though that in general a game has to provide more than that for me to even consider buying it no matter how good it is.