By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ShadowSnake on 10 April 2010
Edit Thread
Galaki said:
theprof00 said:
Galaki said:
So, you defend this "research" w/o knowing how it was done and then call us trolling even the percentage look way off?

Comparing that with vgc stats is totally off, too.
VGC equations are based on factual data and using that to make guesstimate.
And we all know people are totally honest when to do their multiple choice survey.

you have no basis to say that it's wrong.

@everyone else, how do people point and criticize things without even realize they are doing the very same thing they are criticizing?

Oxymoron much?

People aren't allow to disagree with "research" anymore?

typically, when somebody disagrees with research/theories (ie: the earth is flat), they give, what's it called? hmmm... a rebuttal. (ie: the earth is round) and then go on to present mathematical work and recorded observations to show why they "disagree".

you said "So, you defend this "research" w/o knowing how it was done..." and that's perfectly fine. but the only reason you're being attacked here is because you did the very same thing. you attacked the "research" w/o knowing how it was done. so how can you accuse anybody of anything.

EDIT: hmm, 39% does sound fishy, therefore it must've been pulled outa someone's ass. i mean look at it. it's a 3 and 9. THREE..NINE, can't you see the poop?