ramses01 said:
eggs2see said:
BenVTrigger said:
How about we actually see the tech for ourselves people instead of running around and bad mouthing the product. Could Natal be revolutionary? Quite possibly. It could also end up being a huge failure but lets wait until we actually get a good look at the new build and software before drawing conclusions. |
My fellow VG user ben, you state that Natal could very well be revolutionary. Do you mind telling the rest of us how? I don't mean to single you out, but other than hype from the media and from Microsoft, we havn't seen anything to show that Natal is anything better than an improved eyetoy.
While some people may down play Natal as i just have, by you saying that it could very well be revolutionary, with absolutely no evidence at all, you are just as bad.
|
Rather than place the burden on another user to explain things that should be obvious, you might consider why you don't make the same observation.
There is zero doubt that NATAL has the POTENTIAL to be revoluationary. Will it? Who knows, but its potential shouldn't be subject to debate.
|
It should be obvious how natal could be revolutionary? I realise this has been discussed to death, however it doesn't change the fact that there has been no evidence of natal being revolutionary that i have seen. As i originally stated, we havn't seen the natal tech doing anything more than very basic things.
The reason that some people are saying it will be revolutionary is simply because microsoft has told us all this, and we blindly believe.
