Smash_Brother said:
Kasz216 said:
No, putting lots of hours into a game = hardcore. That's the only definition anymore. Otherwise there haven't been more then 6 hardcore games created since the SNES because games have become a LOT easier and require a lot less time and skill since then. Even games that require "skill" are really just a matter of time, as I haven't played one game in the PS1 Era on that was ever unbeatable to anyone who had ever played a videogame system before. There is no game that can't be beaten, so to make some fake dichotomy where the difference is your expierence or your virtual avatars expierence is silly. Hours spent on it are pretty much all that matters. Also, it's not that RPGs are boring (You may think they are though.) They are hardcore, because at bare minmium your looking at 30 hours for most RPGs, with NO sidequests and NO level grinding. That takes a serious dedication there... if you want to do nearly everything it takes HARCORE dedication. Plenty of people put 150+ hours of play in some RPGs just to max everything out. Then they replay the game from the start to play it another way and get an alternate ending. The more time your average player puts into a game = the more hardcore the game is. |
Ergo, Snood is the most hardcore game ever created, right? |
Yes, she is. The game however is not since most Snood users only play it very casually. You are confusing hardcore players with hardcore games.
