why the playstation move is better than natal *questions answered*

[Squilliam]

hollywood85 said:

Squilliam said:

They have shown 0 understanding of why the Wii was successful, they haven't published a new 10M+ selling I.P since the PS1 and they need a bunch of them to beat the Wii. The games they have shown thus far aren't up to snuff, many would be called shovelware on the Wii.

If they aren't making the game experiences then its even worse. It took big name developers like Miyamoto to make the Wii a success and they have joe average making Move games? How is that competitive.

A Wii without Nintendo games is a pretty poor Wii, you really want to make that trade?

that be the point my friend, the move titles will so be shovel ware on the wii.................but if they were on the wii and wii in the title they would sell millions!!!!!!!! sony has not a clue as to the wii success..... which is the market!!!!

in playstations market, there isn't a soul on this earth that will buy that crap........ but on wii, that shit be golden... fucking GOLDEN!!!!! I predict the move will fail hard, to many gamers own ps3, and it's way to late to change that image to a wii one.

I still haven't even decided if they are trying to sell a half priced Wii to the 20M PS3 owners who don't have one or a double the price HD Wii with lesser clones to people who haven't got a Wii. Either way doesn't really make sense, however with E3 there comes clarity.

One thing I do know is that if Move fails, then the market is stupid. Thats the first thing that will pop up on Vgchartz. "How could people deny such perfect engineering?" they will say!