why the playstation move is better than natal *questions answered*

[Squilliam]

kowhoho said:

Squilliam said:
Why its better than Natal? Simple answer is that Sony tells us so. We believe everything that Sony says, all their tech speak/jargon and nonsense makes them very credible because they sound very impressive.

It seems that Sony still doesn't understand why the Wii delivered their face through their butt. Oh and I'll have to wait and see on Move anyway because either Sony lack the vision and turned an epic headstart into an epic failure and made their first impression at E3 last year look uninspired or they lack the vision and were forced to copy Wiimote to catch up. Either way doesn't sound inspired to me, so I question whether they have it in them to actually make compelling game experiences unique to their Move.

If they didn't understand that, Move wouldn't probably exist. :P

For the most part they aren't making the game experiences, a line-up of third party developers are.

Personally, I don't care if it's just the Wii with better tracking. To me it's just a Wii in my PS3 for a cheaper price than the Wii.

They have shown 0 understanding of why the Wii was successful, they haven't published a new 10M+ selling I.P since the PS1 and they need a bunch of them to beat the Wii. The games they have shown thus far aren't up to snuff, many would be called shovelware on the Wii.

If they aren't making the game experiences then its even worse. It took big name developers like Miyamoto to make the Wii a success and they have joe average making Move games? How is that competitive.

A Wii without Nintendo games is a pretty poor Wii, you really want to make that trade?